>>6306015

I’m guessing you are upset because you wanted to famefag and failed.

I highly doubt anyone who is on here now (TOD) has ever paid money or made money from this. Anons research for free.

Also, is this Qntmpks (?) keybase IO going to be the next muh chatlogs?

So tiresome. We don’t give a fuck about you, your threats, generally everything about what you say or do.

You say you are going to dox us but give a generic method of identifying posters to what, a fucking discord server?

Fucking gaslighting bullshit.

Welp, i let you shit up my bread long enough. Maybe other anons will let you rant further, but i’m just going to filter you on sight.

Worthless, impotent threats and dumbass shillary get the filters and congrats, you debased yourself enough to merit it.

Good job and good bye

>>6306042

hammer

meet

nail

>on the head

>>6306414

i actually like these

keep it up!

>6306438

So who is going to be writing the article?

Media Matters

Politico

MagaCoalition

Pussybitch

Shareblue

AIM

Yahoo

WAPO

Either way, shit tier reporting. And as you still have eluded the question of how any of us would be in a keybase for the “program that writes Q drops”, all of it seems pretty far fetched and another attempt at using a similar method as discourse chat logs to try and shut down Q.

>24 hours

I’ll believe it when i see it, then shrug it off as every other gaslighting nothingburger that has been thrown at us.

>>6306461

It’s good and appreciated.

I know i couldn’t do this kind of work (moar of a digger)

so thank you for your contributions