>>6308866

Ok, so it's 2012.

• Obama was spying on political rivals (Re: 4 FBI contractors) and members of the American public

• High ranking members of both the CIA, FBI (others?) are aware and involved in the plot

• During and/or shortly after this time period, some discover the spying and abuse of powers (Admiral Rogers? Michael Hastings digging on Brennan before his death? Andrew Breitbart's upcoming Obama bombshell before his death?)

Now it's 2013.

• To protect from scandal, the CIA and those involved in the illegal spying operation deflect, using “NSA employee” (CIA asset) Edward Snowden. The purpose of Snowden's drops was to frame the NSA with a “spying scandal” as a red herring for the Obama Admin currently running an illegal spying operation on political rivals (same playbook as the current “collusion” deflection)

• Brennan's involvement made him (and the CIA) very uneasy when Michael Hastings was getting a little too close to the sun, and he was eliminated

• Andrew Breitbart also may have also known, or was close on the trail, and a was also eliminated a year earlier in 2012

Plausible or potato?

>>6309106

Yes, but remember at this time (Snowden, 2013), the general public isn't aware of the extent that everything they do is being recorded. Shit, I'd say most of the general public still don't truly understand it.

The scandal isn't really the collection of the data, but how it's being used.

>>6309168

Binney was my introduction. Discovered about a year before the Snowden drops.

>>6309425

Fucking hell. It's clear as day. We've sat through the pre-show trivia, and we're three upcoming movie trailers in. How many more before the movie starts?

>>6309151

Mutual?