>>6317369 lb
>https://twitter.com/i/status/1121597090369400832
just watched it again and notice the O in anon is different thus stands out...... are we looking for (G)(O) codes
>>6317369 lb
>https://twitter.com/i/status/1121597090369400832
just watched it again and notice the O in anon is different thus stands out...... are we looking for (G)(O) codes