Side by side on "It will all be declassified."
>Q on 9/23/18: IT WILL ALL COME OUT
>POTUS on 4/25/19: Everything is going to be declassified, and more, much more than what you just mentioned. It will all be declassified.
Q, confirm?
Night [#] Crumbs Were A Signature About F-117 Nighthawk Stealth Bombers
This is just a theory
There have been recent reports about F-117 sightings and flights, as if they're active again, EVEN THOUGH they were decommissioned years ago in 2007 and 2008.
These were the planes being developed in Area 51 during the 70s and 80s, so they have ALWAYS had secrecy associated with them.
There is new reports about 4 of the f-117 Nighthawks being used once in Syria in 2017.
But there have been reports of "unidentified or unknown aircrafts" CONSTANTLY throughout the campaign against ISIS in Syria and Iraq, I included just a few. There's so many more.
It's highly plausible many more missions have been done using them.
Then I saw in the articles the use of "Night #" to describe the callsign.
I thought of Q's crumbs on Night [#] from April, a few days before the Airstrikes on Syria because of the chemical weapon FALSE FLAGS.
The last Night [#] crumb was Night [5] on 4/12/18, and the strikes happened early in the morning on 4/14/18.
This is theoretical, but Q posted Night [2], Night [3], Night [4], and Night [5], implying 4 Night [#]s
Night [#] → Night # → NightHawk # → F-117 → 4 F-117s
On the 14th ALSO, there was a giant explosion at an Iranian base in Syria from an "unidentified" aircraft or aircrafts that was blamed on Israel.
It seriously crippled Iranian forces in that area, of Northern Syria.
Q asked "What if Iran created a classified ‘satellite’ Nuclear facility in Northern Syria?", and also asked "Why did we strike Syria? Why did we really strike Syria?".
I don't think we hit targets AT the facility, but we hit targets at this base to PREVENT anything from continuing there, and Q uses "prevent" a lot in the crumbs I put in the graphic, even saying "Prevent at all costs."
The theory is that Q was telling us we were striking COVERTLY, while the international spectacle of the OVERT airstrikes were happening using supposedly decommissioned F-117 Nighthawks.
This also means we could be hitting cabal targets covertly ALL THE TIME, and likely are.
why?
Paytriots have no place on /qresearch/
Exactly!
I hope Mueller talks about it or is asked about it if he testifies, which would be a fucking show.
Megajew, first of all, no one likes you.
Secondly, anything can be lined up on that stupid shit, you can't explain why it's notable.
kys faggot, go suck paytriot dick
>No one likes you either. See how this works. Please have your defenders come and say different to prove my point. You discredit yourself immediate. Try a new tactic. And you should probably read a few crumbs. You are not the majority.
>No one likes you either. See how this works. Please have your defenders come and say different to prove my point. You discredit yourself immediate. Try a new tactic. And you should probably read a few crumbs. You are not the majority.
>No one likes you either. See how this works. Please have your defenders come and say different to prove my point. You discredit yourself immediate. Try a new tactic. And you should probably read a few crumbs. You are not the majority.
>No one likes you either. See how this works. Please have your defenders come and say different to prove my point. You discredit yourself immediate. Try a new tactic. And you should probably read a few crumbs. You are not the majority.
go suck megajew's dick: >>6318004
go back to reddit you stupid boomer, you're legitimately useless
>Accusing Anons of being "Megajew" for trying to understand the CLOCK?
KEK, if you lurked moar, you'd know who "megajew" is. Not my nickname for that faggot.
>That is the CLOCK that was developed. Get used to it.
Did Q confirm that yet?
You're defending a known shill, it's hilarious to watch!
>why post something so divisive and disrespectful to other anons on this board? Division-fagging is never good.
when the hell did you get here and where did you come from?
calling out something as fake and gay isn't divisive, it's OUR DUTY to call it out.
it would never make it past the senate, I don't think it went anywhere
you're using a month's old tactic cunt
>The anons who follow the Q clock are not shills and deserve better.
and you know this how?
>How come this has come up so strongly recently?
anons have pushed back against it since they made it up
>Why not last month or six months ago?
not anons' fault you didn't lurk moar
>Why is the q clock still listed under "Other Tools" in every bread?
it shouldn't be, can be taken out really easily
>Why is the Q clock included in countless notables?
because newfags, boomers, clockfags in a circle jerk, and shills promote it knowingly or unknowingly.
>Asking and answering questions like this is the kind of argument that might get us somewhere.
have you ever actually tried to ask a clockshill a question?
All I asked was "why?" as in why is this notable, and got called a shill
try lurking moar before inserting yourself into a long running debate you know nothing about