Anonymous ID: e3b929 April 25, 2019, 8:57 p.m. No.6318472   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6318319 pb

Re clocking fagging

Thx for your thoughtful reply. I've seen the debate go on from time to time, but more strongly recently. To be honest, there is a lot of "numbers" stuff that is not easy to verify, not just the clock fag stuff. Gematria is not easily verified, for example, although it is intriguing. Some of the most brilliant people I know are into it.

But sometimes people see numerical correlations where the evidence seems a bit thin. Where is the line between a hunch and something more substantive?

 

BTW, I didn't call you a shill or anybody else a shill. I said to another anon–the one who posted the meme with the crayoning on top of the clock–the "unless you are a shill, why post something…so divisive"? I never call someone a shill outright, but sometimes raise the question when an argument is made with more heat than light.

 

I don't wish to continue this discussion because it's not productive, I see from LB. Probably something that only Q can resolve.

Anonymous ID: e3b929 April 25, 2019, 9:34 p.m. No.6318832   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8897

>>6318802

Breaking news right before the broadcast was a little disconcerting for all. They couldn't ignore it but it probably disrupted the flow a bit. Hannity was trying to support POTUS by briefing him at the start, I appreciated that.

Anonymous ID: e3b929 April 25, 2019, 9:43 p.m. No.6318912   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6318817

>>6318846

Victory, victory, victory–friends!!!

Praying for all the anons & bakers, but special prayers for bakers to find solutions to overuse problems, because we need all of us.

 

Moar bakers is one solution. Please consider learning to bake, anons!!