>>6319109, >>6319168, >>6319160
Kek, you're all good bakers.
Thanks for all you do for /qresearch/
>watch out for this one: 6130d7
Still raging from lb I see.
>no place id rather be
#MeToo
>Any plans on cleaning up the globals?
No we already took care of that
>Maybe actually relevant and Q related stuff could be back in notables when you delete the 8bit famefagging…
"Relevant Q related stuff" has never left notables.
Try reading them.
And the best way to ensure notables suit you personally is to bake them yourself.
Short of that, don't act like a total nigger when nominating.
Nonstop crying at baker tends to work the least well.
But you do you.
I put it in the wrong place like a faggot
kek baker