That is such BS.

>>632922

>>>632264

Then he was a 6-book idiot.

>>632959

>>>632881

That book is a proven forgery. Take the time to research it before you pass it on. Even stuff you see here deserves to be researched before just regurgitating it. There are tons of theories you can find on the web and not all of them re right. You see lots of stuff in here that is just not true. Like misidentification of the Parkland shooter went on for almost half a day. And then misidentification of Kevin Hogg. If you are going to try to red-pill someone, make sure you do it with the truth. And not with BS.

>>632999

You are an ignoramus.

>>633040

Elements of the Protocols were plagiarized from Joly's fictional Dialogue in Hell, a thinly veiled attack on the political ambitions of Napoleon III, who, represented by the non-Jewish character Machiavelli,[15] plots to rule the world. Joly, a monarchist and legitimist, was imprisoned in France for 15 months as a direct result of his book's publication. Scholars have noted the irony that Dialogue in Hell was itself a plagiarism, at least in part, of a novel by Eugène Sue, Les Mystères du Peuple (1849–56).[16]

Identifiable phrases from Joly constitute 4% of the first half of the first edition, and 12% of the second half; later editions, including most translations, have longer quotes from Joly.[17]

The Protocols 1–19 closely follow the order of Maurice Joly's Dialogues 1–17. For example:

https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion

It's because the Arabs/Turks would not allow them to practice any other occupation.

>>633074

If you look at the Wikipedia article they give specific and documented examples of the works that it was plagiarized from.

>>633087

Yes, really.

>>633113

Yeah, it's much easier to be mentally lazy, use an ad hominem argument, spew hatred, than it is to read and learn and consider that maybe you're WRONG.

>>633091

>>633174