Oh I see. So you would like all those volunteers who serve here to stand down, and you will handle it yourself. You have the social media skills to inform the public about the unfolding treason and the millenia-old satanic cabal's grip on humanity, in a way that will not lead to riots and civil disturbances. You will answer Q's call to protect and comfort those around you. You have those skills.
Q !UW.yye1fxo No.9 📁
Jan 13 2018 22:18:18 (EST)
We are FIGHTING for LIFE.
We are FIGHTING for GOOD.
We are at WAR [@].
NOT EVERYTHING WILL BE CLEAN.
[SCARE] NECESSARY EVENT.
Do you TRUST the US Military?
Do you TRUST the Chain Of Command?
Have FAITH - WE ARE IN CONTROL.
PATRIOTS.
PATRIOTS DAY.
HAVE FAITH.
YOU WERE CHOSEN FOR A REASON.
YOU ARE BEING PROVIDED THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF INTEL TO EVER BE DROPPED PUBLICLY IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD.
USE IT - PROTECT AND COMFORT THOSE AROUND YOU.
WHERE WE GO ONE, WE GO ALL.
Q
God bless you, fren.
Make up a new word for it then.
In the dissertation of Major Walter E. Richter, US Army, THE FUTURE OF INFORMATION OPERATIONS IN THE
UNITED STATES ARMY SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF OPERATIONAL STUDIES,
he does refer to information warfare as "war" numerous times.
The people whose ideas need to be changed are not merely an enemy's warfighters – they are the civilian population of a nation. Perhaps in that light it makes sense to use civilians to perform some of the information operations, since they are members of the target population subgroups, with knowledge of those subgroups' characteristics and what would influence them in the context of an information operation.
But yes, why don't you make up a new word for what is occurring in the Q operation. Fine with me. I'm sure nobody intended to "offend" by using terminology borrowed from a military setting. It's more likely that the terminology you find offensive was borrowed out of respect.