>>6331361

I am that I am - in the KJV. Strong's likens this to "self-existent one." The term "am" means to exist. But to "exist that I exist (further),"

means a whole lot more.

This name is one of the greatest indicators of eternal life in ancient thought. Jesus would later say this was exactly when Moses was shown eternal life. And it is represented in this name.

It is said history repeats. But nature also repeats. Even the rise and fall of the governments of man repeat in similar fashions. So, according to this name, in order to "keep coming around," or keep existing, everything "God" does (as recorded in scripture) He did so the same would/could occur again similarly at a later time every time the same natural forces of repeat to which such actions or words pertained come around again.

I know this is lost of most anons. But the ones who code and know the codes of scripture already know this too.

>>6331554

Some know very well what ascension means.

I wouldn't take it from DW though.

Its a metaphor for taking the upper hand - for

seeing further, having more influence, power.

This is very methodically taught in scripture.

>>6331554

>>6331594

We are all, here, quite somewhat ascended already.

>>6331607

I see you have made the egregious error of most effeminate preachers and laity - trying to understand the OT from within the NT. Only the opposite is possible. The OT was the foundation for the New.

>>6331610

Maybe if you didn't have 24 posts on this thread you could have put some thought into a few of them instead.

>>6331650

I second the fuck off

>>6331667

We don't need Wilcock like we don't need Corey Goode, like we don't need the Zeitgeisters or Pleidians - to take the helm at inspiration.