re:

Mar 07 2018 15:56:26

Q !UW.yye1fxo

580331

How did @Snowden clear customs/immigration in HK AFTER the public release?

Why wouldn’t he FIRST travel to final destination prior to public release?

If wanted by the US govt would he be cleared to travel?

Who provided support to escape?

Who was the US after during this time?

JA - have you learned & eliminated L-6?

Use logic.

Q

Who provided support to escape? Wikileaks. Specifially, Susan Harrison, Legal Defense of Wikileaks.

Who was the US after at that time? JA

JA - have you learned & eliminated L-6?

Hmmm, this one is keeping me thinking. Cuz, I keep coming back around to Q's way of tautology – asking questions with the same answer – but yet, the answers can be seen to also lead to more complex answers. Such as – who helped snowden leave? 1st answer, Wikileaks (let's say). 2nd answer, Susan Harrison, Legal Defense of Wikileaks. Then yteh next question.

JA - have you learned & eliminated L-6?

Susan Harrison

https:// www.theregister.co.uk/2016/09/12/edward_snowden_wikileaks_sarah_harrison/

>>633581

Thus Using Logic.

Tautology.

Rewritten to be more concise:

RE:

Mar 07 2018 15:56:26

Q !UW.yye1fxo

580331

How did @Snowden clear customs/immigration in HK AFTER the public release?

Why wouldn’t he FIRST travel to final destination prior to public release?

If wanted by the US govt would he be cleared to travel?

Who provided support to escape?

Who was the US after during this time?

JA - have you learned & eliminated L-6?

Use logic.

Q

Q often asks a question and then another – both having the same answer.

Such as:

1) Who provided (Snowden) support to escape?

Julian Assange. (2nd answer: Julain Assange's right hand woman, Susan Harrison, Wikileaks Legal Defense).

2) Who was the US after during this time? Julian Assage, same answer as first answer in above.

3) JA- have you learned & eliminated L-6?

Susan Harrison, same answer as 2nd answer in #1.

Q says to Use Logic. It just seems to be the only logical connection.

https:// www.theregister.co.uk/2016/09/12/edward_snowden_wikileaks_sarah_harrison/

>>633773

Possibly. But, don't you think if the US govt' with all it's powers – if they really wanted a guy – they could get him no matter where he was? Seems more likely that Q is pointing to CIA allowing him to exit.