Sparrow Red = SPA[RR]OW ROD?
(I was going to try to write this all up before posting, but now I think I'll just post as I go...
prior stuff to be rewritten and incorporated...
>>6306701 (pb)
>>6331880 (pb)
I'll keep workin throught the weekend as a "self-employed carpet installer". TOP F'IN KEK!)
I've put out a few pieces of this over the past few days and now I am increasingly convinced that I'm onto something big here, so I'll try to pull a bunch of different angles together. Basically, I suspect Q team is now overtly signalling that Rod Rosenstein is a white hat, although the groundwork for this has seemingly been there all along.
Obviously, Q has repeatedly insinuated that RR is up to no good. Think of the images where he is behind bars with the other bad players. But ANYTHING Q says can be disinfo: DISINFO IS NECESSARY.
Does it make sense to think of RR as a white hat? Others know more about this than I do. Take Brian Cates, for instance. Q has linked to him multiple times. He makes a plausible case that RR "is going to deserve a medal". He argues that RR is eventually going to need to leave his post because he will be a prosecution witness in the trials of many of the malefactors. It all sounds at least plausible to me:
https://twitter.com/drawandstrike/status/1097696781096374274
I am not going to focus on RR's actual actions, or on how this portion of "the show" might be meant to function if I am right, but rather on the clues in the Q drops and elsewhere and what they seem to be telling us.
Let's start with 4 Jan 2018. The first hint that Q is focusing on the departure of RR comes at 12:43 AM. Then at 12:44 Q drops "What makes a move GOOD? GREAT actors?". Coincidence? I'd say it might be a sign that the RR departure drama is ACTING.
(continued)