Anonymous ID: c9b9d6 April 27, 2019, 10:13 p.m. No.6343895   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6343738

>dude I have dropped real info often and had it ignored

former baker here. i'll try to add some perspective. imo, one of the hardest parts about baking is keeping track of notables and keeping the dough updated to reflect everything. very often, enough time is spent kneading & baking that it becomes impossible to gather notables yourself, relying instead on anons to gather them for you. when a baker is taxed to this degree, it becomes extremely unlikely that he can investigate the merit of each notable. this results in a very common issue seen across all boards: repetition and multiple (you)'s will give an appearance of merit to a post, increasing the likelyhood that it will be added to notables. many times the best posts are overlooked because wall_of_autism.jpg. if you have posted something that you genuinely think is notable and it gains no traction, then ignore board etiquette and start shilling for your own post. become an annoying fucking nigger until you get some (you)'s. it may still be ignored and overlooked, but at least it will have been seen. adding a caption or summary will increase the chances of anons reading the entire post. clickbait works, no matter how annoying it is. gibs some clickbait for anons to help your post gain traction.

 

hope that helps

Anonymous ID: c9b9d6 April 27, 2019, 11:19 p.m. No.6344419   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6344361

that's a pretty good article, anon

 

>Hannigan’s exit is almost certainly more than it seems, and the Flynn dismissal also would appear to have aspects that have not yet surfaced and, in truth, might never see the light of day. It is not unreasonable to argue that it can all be connected. Aggrieved senior officials closely tied to the outgoing White House might have surreptitiously sought assistance from a “special relationship friend” in a foreign government to make a case that would humiliate and ultimately bring down an unlovable and abrasive incoming national-security advisor.