>>6347754

>this latest synagogoue attack

>coupled with letters proves beyond any doubt >that the biggest shill attack on this board

>are the muhjoos

>that is the path to discrediting the board

While I have learned a lot from the muh joos, and am certainly not a fan of (((them))), I agree 110 percent. This is a Q Research board, not a Joo Research board. At this point, one can only conclude we have been infiltrated by a group who is seeking to sabotage this board from within.

>>6347999

Also, check those digits.

>>6348069

> you came to us, we didn't come to you.

Wrong. I followed Q. And who, exactly is "us," anyway, David?

>>6348079

Here (((you))) go, have a (((YOU))). May your shekels ever shine in your greasy palm.

>>6348116

>>6348113

Thank you, Anon. Good to know there are still some remaining anons who can think logically.

>>6348156