>>6349069 (pb)

>https://twitter.com/Tara4MAGA/status/1122564132098719744?s=19

He may litterally be that dumb to really not have known.

the duplicituous have multiple loops, they travel in all of them. He's a rube, and a willingly blind ideolouge who was deeply in love with either some one or something about that time of his life.

we can all make up what we want.

but however, is he really that dumb?

the man in the horizontal stripes, to peg him in a codeification of 'symbolic' attire. He looks much better in an Italian Suit, was not an unhandsome man.

he kind of morphed into the guy without any smiles.

maybe he really is just that dumb.