Anonymous ID: e1d6c3 May 4, 2019, 5:09 a.m. No.6410969   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1206 >>3491 >>5671 >>8825

After being 'caught' bang to rights (spygate) it's my opinion that (((their))) punishment is to now completely dismantle the current corrupt British system quietly from within.

 

I don't think there will ever be the supersonic 'BOOM' that we're all waiting for

 

TM is doing a sterling job of destroying Tory, and now Labour parties, paving the way for Nigel Farage to be the next leader with a brand new Libertarian 'for the people, by the people' party.

 

After reading Toronto Papers very Q-like timeline on twitter - https://twitter.com/torontopaper1 - I have an eerie feeling' that BRF could also be in the process of dismantling themselves (via MM) from within. I think Britain will become a Republic in a few years

 

I also think it will be revealed that we DID in fact leave the eu on March 29th, but not until the majority of the British people wake up

 

As I say, this is just 'Muh Feels' and I recognise that I might be completely off target

 

 

>>6410823

>>6392614

Anonymous ID: e1d6c3 May 11, 2019, 4:04 a.m. No.6470380   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4932

John Redwood: Letter to Attorney General about Mrs May's WA delay Treaty

Dear Geoffrey,

Mrs May's Withdrawal Treaty stops us Leaving EU!

  1. If we sign this Treaty we are locked into EU to obey all its rules & pay all the bills it sends us!

 

I am concerned about number of Articles in the draft Treaty that expressly extend EU powers & jurisdiction for further 4-8 years beyond our departure.

 

There's much more I could object to!

It's Not a Treaty to take back control

It's Not a Treaty for a newly independent nation

£39bn is just for starters!

 

https://twitter.com/astro_trader/status/1127162752550756352

 

http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2019/05/10/my-letter-to-the-attorney-general-about-the-delay-brexit-withdrawal-agreement/

Anonymous ID: e1d6c3 May 11, 2019, 4:31 a.m. No.6470441   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4932

MAY IN THE DOCK: Court Case Challenges Brexit Extension

 

I am sure that no Brexiteer can forget Gina Miller and how she took the government to court in a bid to force the Government to put triggering Article 50 and therefore beginning the Brexit process to a Parliamentary vote. Miller successfully argued her case and incidentally at the time told the then UKIP leader, Nigel Farage that he should be her “biggest fan”.

 

Now the proverbial boot is (kind of) on the other foot as Robin Tilbrook, Chairman of the English Democrats, is challenging the legality of seemingly interminable extension of Article 50. Although, of course, were the government to lose this case it would illicit an almighty cheer from every Brexiteer up and down the land, this is not, strictly speaking about the politics of Leave v Remain as the claim submitted to the High Court explains:

 

This is not an attempt to engage in politics by another means but a question of whether the Crown may, without primary legislation and potentially indefinitely, extend the application of EU law, the obligations of membership and the fetter it places on Parliamentary sovereignty.

 

If the case is successful then it will be ruled that Britain left the EU on March 29th with no deal and so the dream of a clean Brexit on WTO terms will become a reality.

 

The central issue here in the case is if the government acted outside its legal authority by extending Article 50. In some ways, this case is the antithesis of the Miller case as her essential argument was that the government, acting without Parliaments authority, had no right to remove the legal rights she is afforded by EU law and this claim argues that the government has no right to extend the legal authority of EU law indefinitely. However, the arguments that she successfully made do play a large part in this case as both pertain to the limits of legal authority that the government has without recourse to Parliament.

 

So, the claim has been submitted by Mr Tilbrook and the government has responded. In its response, the government, represented by the same attorney that represented it during the Miller case, Sir James Raymond Eadie, QC, has put forward a somewhat pithy attempt to rebut the claim centering on the technical and financial feasibility of the claim itself and the assertion that to allow the case to proceed would result in chaos. However, that has been stoutly rebutted:

 

The Defendants’ reliance on the disruptive consequences of the UK being found already to have withdrawn from the European Union and ‘all the recent events [and] consideration of the question by Parliament’ since the extension challenged (SGR para 1) have no bearing on whether it is lawful. In the words of Lord Denning, ​“… ​even​ ​if​ ​chaos​ should result [it is not conceded that it would],​ ​still​ ​the​ ​law​ ​must​ ​be obeyed” (Bradbury​ ​v​ ​London​ ​Borough​ ​of​ ​Enfield​ ​(1967)​ ​3​ ​ER​ ​434,​ ​(1967)​ ​1 WLR​ ​1311​).

 

In other words, the law remains the law regardless of the consequences and it must be adhered too on that basis. Currently, permission for the case to be heard is under consideration, a stage that all judicial reviews must pass through. Once that has been decided it will either be ruled upon or it will be ‘rolled-up’ with the hearing itself which will be heard at the High Court (with any appeal going to the Supreme Court).

 

As the Parliamentary chaos continues to swirl around the Brexit process this case, in some regards seems like a world away from all that, however, it is worth considering the possibility put to me on the phone by Mr Tilbrook that the unwillingness of a unrepresentative Remain Parliament may in time render this case the only avenue through which Brexit can be actually achieved. With that thought in mind this case should be at the center of every Brexiteers attention and here on Politicalite we will be keeping you up to date with how it progresses.

 

https://www.politicalite.com/brexit/may-in-the-dock-court-case-challenges-brexit-extension/

Anonymous ID: e1d6c3 May 12, 2019, 5:45 a.m. No.6478925   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Brexit Party Unveils Election Broadcast

 

Impressive…!!

 

https://order-order.com/2019/05/12/brexit-party-unveils-election-broadcast/

Anonymous ID: e1d6c3 May 12, 2019, 7:07 a.m. No.6479227   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6479101

 

Royal family is a problem anon.

 

Many Brits suffer from some sort of Stockholm syndrome, and can't accept the truth about them.

 

This is possibly due to unrelenting PR along with sickly nostalgic support from the MSM

Anonymous ID: e1d6c3 May 12, 2019, 7:40 a.m. No.6479401   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6479321

 

The message is being spread by various means to suit the individual listener's personality…

 

The anons have Q.

The normies have various twitter accounts who inform them, whilst pooh poohing Q as a 'conspiracy theory'…

 

There may be other ways ongoing too

 

The message is basically the same.

How it's delivered (and how much is delivered) is tailored to suit the individual

Anonymous ID: e1d6c3 May 19, 2019, 8:43 a.m. No.6535899   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Trump 'wants Farage to join State banquet' hosted by the Queen at Buckingham Palace when the US President visit the UK next month

 

Trump is now 'trying to secure an invitation for Nigel Farage to join the banquet'

 

The banquet is already being boycotted by Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, Commons Speaker John Bercow, London Mayor Sadiq Khan and Lib Dem leader Sir Vince Cable.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7045417/Trump-wants-Farage-join-State-banquet-hosted-Queen-Buckingham-Palace.html

Anonymous ID: e1d6c3 May 19, 2019, 9:05 a.m. No.6536045   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6233 >>7055

>>6535934

I'd say the police were part of it.

Tommy may, or may not be…. Who knows?

 

It was done so the BBC could create bad headlines for the Brexit movement. It's the 1% STILL attempting to create division and civil war in the country.

 

Stand strong and remember, it's the 1% that arrange these events who are the problem

Anonymous ID: e1d6c3 May 19, 2019, 9:57 a.m. No.6536379   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6536233

 

Their bosses let rape gangs roam the UK. I've heard that any copper who disagrees with the 'orders' gets cold shouldered out of the force

 

BTW Red caps is not a good look, rather shilly

Anonymous ID: e1d6c3 May 27, 2019, 4:15 a.m. No.6600277   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0284 >>0445

The MSM are choosing to add together remainer votes so they can claim that Leave lost!

 

Smoke and Mirrors!

 

Look at what they're hiding!

 

A General Election, with people voting like that, would result in a landslide under FPTP

 

https://twitter.com/TrevorHoneyman/status/1132913509237436416