> COLLUDING to shut down the chans
but then encouraging bans & deletion is also part of it.
problem, reaction, "solution".
or being a publisher vs platform: being open, yes optics can be bad, but enforcing rules means anything not adressed weighs in with more of an endorsement than otherwise.
and that's quite the slippery slope.
>Ignore at your peril.
who said ignore?
i'm saying be weary of the alleged "solution" proposed.
if the only posts allowed are those you agree with (and agreement is ever fleeting ie impossible), then instead of being responsible for nothing, you are responsible for everything.
Ignore at your peril.
>thanks to msm strategic presentation of “proof”
self-own.
by that logic
what we actually do is irrelevant
don't care much about Pew but he's still waaay better than
>Shane Dawson
who is something of a furry who admitted coming on his cat's fur
>easier w moar
dude never been around for a rally bread or a Q&A…
moare ain't always better