Anonymous ID: 1bc7a5 April 28, 2019, 3:58 p.m. No.6351945   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Ben Collins' claim that an anon on 8chan said "get a high score" to SD shooter is based on half-baked evidence

Take a look at the actual thread anons. Not at all clear what this anon really knew or wanted to say. Very good chance the anon posting did not read the manifesto, thought shooter was talking about some game he was playing. Thoughts?

 

Sauce:

https://www.bellingcat.com/news/americas/2019/04/28/ignore-the-poway-synagogue-shooters-manifesto-pay-attention-to-8chans-pol-board/

Anonymous ID: 1bc7a5 April 28, 2019, 4:11 p.m. No.6352094   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6351765

Elegant analysis, went to the story to see if 75,000 people were specifically mentioned. Yes, indeed. 500000/75000=6.66 exactly.

notable

 

>https://abcnews.go.com/International/pope-francis-donates-500000-migrants-us-border/story?id=62675582

Anonymous ID: 1bc7a5 April 28, 2019, 4:22 p.m. No.6352192   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2241

>>6351834

I also like deep digs, too, but realize they need some kind of newspeg–either from Q, POTUS, or IRL–to catch the interest of bakers and other anons. The deeper you dig, the harder it is for others to follow, especially in an image-board format. I also understand better after learning to bake how that end of things works, and how hard it can be to decipher deep diggs.

 

BUT I often find I can post part of some diff info when a "newspeg" does come up. I just can't post it any old time.

 

Thanks for your service, digger-frens. QResearch couldn't function without dedicated diggers.