>>6357259
Well…mult interpretations I could get there. Boom 17 not until Feb of '20 or maybe 2 days from now in '19. I'm leaning toward a Chuck Woolery pre-commerical-break line. But I have too many conflicting puzzle pieces floating around right now. Today is exactly 1 month prior to a relevant date. I dunno any more.
>>6357222
>>6357269
Anyone with a sense of strategy and general idea of what "the plan" is trying to achieve, and a sense of "the movie" that's being played out for normie-world to see evil "on their own" without being told where or who it is–they need to "figure it out for themselves" by watching a movie they think is reality…that type of anon should be able formulate some idea of where this might be going. If Dems are found to be behind a gun incident of great magnitude in both an attempt to take out an enemy AND blame "evil guns" for it in a simultaneous attempt to get them further banned…being very transparently discovered in the act and put on full display for the public to see… well, that would be a real eye-opener… and a nail in their coffin. They already did a MISSILE version of this against Air Force One! "Shot heard round the world" possibly incoming soon-ish? Hypothetical concept makes me mildly nervous and uncomfortable, but I'm also a fairly pragmatic realist.