>>6359173 OB
Re [JPC]
>>6358848 OB
Good reminder, Anon. TY.
What purpose might Q have intended with John Carlin → [J C] → [JPC] – John P. Carlin? Ended back where we had started.
On superficial level, distinguishes from other JCs – John Clapper and James Comey, for examples, but Q has not distinguished these two examples from each other with similar method.
Also, is the implication that JPC was sheltered even as he had already been outed by his having been removed from that particular office? Seems overly (not usefully) redundant. IDK. Missing something else?