>>6362386 April RAF to LA query.

Look up what a RAF aviation callsign looks like.

Go to flightaware.com

Type or click the desired LA area airport.

Request historical landings data.

Start scanning callsigns for a UK callsign.

Request next page.

Rinse, repeat.

Next day. Rinse repeat.

Next airport. Rinse repeat.

It's not quite a needle in a haystack problem but almost, with the tools available to us.

This tool will have civil air traffic but not military.

If it landed at a military air field then you pretty much need to know the tail number to look up its activity using ADSBexchange.com historical flight data.

It's not a task I would volunteer for.

>>6362581

Sorry it's LAST BREAD

>>6362558

I do like the imagery of mighty waters rushing downward.

>>6362642

>>6362563

>>6362651

>>6363011

I wouldn't spend my time on it.

Fruitless task. I don't know who these personnel are or why anybody cares.

If it's important to you, good luck digging it. Too many other commitments here requiring 8-12 hours every day.

>>6363143

I didn't mean to denigrate UK/EU politics. I'm cheering for you, anon.

What I meant by fruitless is that I don't think there's a snowball's chance in hell of locating the specific plane, using the tools that planefags have available, unless you're willing to devote literally a week's time to it.