>>6363304 (pb)

I didn't call you bad. I said you needed a lesson in

humility.

no matter how good your meme is, people will tell you it sucks, even if it doesn't.

is that saying you are bad? no: it's saying you are boastful and that the reaction to that is to haze you about your meme. you are being not 'bad' but 'unhumble'.

that's not the same thing.

if we didn't care we wouldn't say anything. you don't burst into a place with top dog pilots and boast about being able to grab a weather-vein off a barn roof by flying past it upside down and just reaching out and grabbing it.

there is a video of Marines in battle gear for a bout of training, and they beat the crap out of each other with these big battons made of . . . something that doesn't really hurt them very much.

and they do it for training.

that's kind of what is happening to you by being boast ful here. the dogs of meme warfare won't have it.

I know that others make much better memes than I do, and they've been very kind in enduring my shitposts of memes. Sometimes they would thud.

but some were better.

anon means anon, no boast.

the lions in the room are like, 'listen, little cub, this is equality'

>>6363449

not me, anon. I'm a real person at a keyboard who thinks maybe people learn stuff by reading through the posts.

not trying to divide. Trying to show that anon that if he boasts, he's going to have to deal with a lesson in humility.

Unless you were describing what you are doing by answering my rather random post to someone else?

>>6363483

anon means anon.

fame fagging is discouraged.

wait, do you have the chat logs?

>>6363563

oh, shit, I was hoping it reall was JPoso because at least I admire some of his work and I could maybe give you a small nod then. He's a boastful jerk too, but that's becase everybody picks on him.

>>6363379

if some posts the exact same stuff bread to bread it ought to be a simple programming project to have a call back that tests for exactness of posts.

then at least turds like this guy would be 'special cased' and their robo posts, while not being 'censored' would be filtered.

maybe a check box for 'filter duplicate and repetitive posts.' that defaults checked .

leave the bakers alone, robo-poster.

>>6363847

why are you shitposting about this sculpture/fountain?