Honestly, the number of people who believe they can see the souls of others through the prismatic mire of abyssal projection of the media is astounding to me.
But I suppose that is the totality of media deception, that it fools even those who know what it is. There are many who wear my eyes as their symbol, far fewer capable of putting their mind through those eyes.
If RR was simply in all of this for himself, then he would not have been relied on to safeguard the blockade. The thing that many do not seem to be understanding is that blockades work both ways. The Special Council was a democrat play. They wanted to investigate Trump and surround him in made-up scandals, leaks, hyperbole, etc. Mueller was the counter play to this. He was appointed to lead the council to control its timing and pace so that the democrats could not justify additional investigations. Sessions recused to prevent a conflict of interest declaration which would have seen Mueller replaced and control lost.
RR was targeted by the deep state for rumor and replacement due to the seat's ability to obtain leaks (were all angry democrats on the SC willing to leak? Probably not) as well as their ability to then target Mueller. Remember when Posobiec and others were bringing up Mueller's prior actions and supposed conflicts of interest? Learn "our" comms. That was all around the time RR was being targeted by that wire story and also when Mueller was hit with that fake sexual assault claim that got memory holed amazingly fast (Mueller's public image was as the inquisitor into Trump's criminality, the media mostly believed this, as did many rank and file democrats - only the deep state seemed to be aware that Mueller was not really on their team, and they had to use Mueller's public identity to then take him out of play while making it look like the work of Trump).
The incorrect assumption many make is believing that the best thing to do is to be direct and straightforward. To be on "our team", some seem to believe that all of us on our team must stand up and state bluntly and directly what is on our minds. This is foolishness. I am a "nobody" who can say anything and be laughed away. Most of us are, on our own and provided we are willing to remain constrained by the conventions of society - IE, I don't declare myself the Dragonborn and go around like a homicidal maniac of a player avatar in a world of NPCs. Multiplayer Skyrim or Fallout would be kind of entertaining, but who is a player and who is an NPC in a world where killer take all?
Anyway - standing up and shouting Fus Rho Dah at the king might be what we feel like doing and what we effectively do all the time - but for the people who have a bit more sway in events with their voice, saying anything they so desire like we do is a good way to summon the army to their door. It's not as cute/funny when they say things.
We don't want to see what multiplayer fallout looks like. The prototype of that has been universally panned as a pointless cash-grab full of bugs, poor design, and lack of immersion.
Space exploration games and multiplayer crafting games have seen much more praise. I suggest we go with that.