DW is like an information proxy for a lot of good actors
Understand that Barron Trumps Marvelous Underground Adventure is not a story, its a documentary.
Many different species live underground but not all of them play ball with us or with each other, theres a lot of contention between the many races. Bad and Good are just words we use to generalise our perception of what we want and dont want, some think we are bad because we are mad they gave us bung tech and they gave us bung tech because they dont want us, in all our warlike natural habitat, to take that to their place. We may think they are bad for lying to us and giving us their version 1.0 tech but hey, the Cole Protocol exists in our dimension and the essence of that probably exists in theirs.
Your idea of an Ark in an orbit is along the right path but even i dont know the exact machinations of how it happened.
Why it happens? Solar System wide destruction, possibly solar flare related.
what are the chances i guess the height of 13-14 feet is the height of that statue?
yes.
Because…?
Why are BlackBerries used over iPhones?
Security reasons?
Spectre/Meltdown style?
Ok ill try to elaborate because over the time its taken me to get this far, ive learned the process at a bare minimum of how you can come to the same place.
First off, you cant simply tell people the truth. You cant do this because humans are programmed to not think for themselves, you get your info from authoritarian sources (Schools, Parent who pass down the information, some extent TV and media), you are told things like "science is rigorous and this is the reason why x" which is VERY believable, especially on young minds, primarily though ages 8 to 22. Once you formulate that idea, you introduce a traumatic event, since humans 'evolve' fast going through traumatic experiences. "Dont do drugs kids they are bad, look what happened to Uncle Rod, he smoked pot at a young age and now hes mentally slowed and deficient" (truth, im not pro-pot but im pro-'do what you will'). This sets in stone the idea of X. Now, if you wanted to say otherwise, lets say, "Pot has been shown to help ease seizures and reduce cancers/glaucoma", you would not believe this at first. BUT you will be if the Authoritative figure you looked up to at the beginning comes out and says, "oh yeah that happens". Now isnt it interesting that you will believe contradictory statements, as long as they are from the same 'believable' authoritarian source.
Using this basic human concept, we can deduce that
a) any person that's indoctrinated into a belief system that uses an authoritarian source will only change there beliefs if the source changes their story.
b) any opposing or challenging belief system introduced that has not gone through the process of Primer>Trauma>Reinforcement, will not be even considered as an opposing argument by the person, even if the information it shows may prove to be correct.
Now with that 'basically' explained you will need to move onto the next part.
To change the perception of someone in this style of system, you need to introduce information GRADUALLY to maintain their idea that the belief system is still correct, without the chance they realise somethings wrong. Using the pot example, we saw a gradual change in opinions from the Authoritarian Source (generalised as "scientists") that started to state things like "certain parts of pot have positive effects on X" and then that will get 'picked up' by the media and pushed as a general consensus. ("durr because if it on tv everyone believe it hurr") This starts the change of public opinion while still staying within that authoritarian control system.
So in order to keep control, regardless of stated belief, you have to gradually push the idea that everyone around you also believes X.
Now this is where i see Q utilising something the media cannot. Q's system of dropping crumbs is not telling us to believe anything. Its making the collective conscious go out there and find meaning/the truth. when the collective conscious (Hivemind) finds something and latches onto it, this is an organic way of breaking the control of the learned Authoritarian belief system. In this way of operation, the mind comes across information in a neutral light, it doesnt say information Y is right or wrong, it just internalises information Y. Whether or not you believe X or Y is dependent on how profound the impact of that new knowledge shocks your previous belief system, similar to the way of trauma.
How this plays into me original statement of being punched in the gut, is that, for a majority of people, the new knowledge will be so traumatic when it comes to light that they will physically shut down in a state of 'pain', the trauma is so blunt and quick that you have no way of being built up to the drop. Thats why its so hard to change or to believe in a different belief system. You inherently fear the pain/trauma you would have to go through in order to change and immediately block it out because it protects the mind and body against itself.
Much like a frog in the pan, through it into boiling water, it will jump out. Simmer and bring to a boil, and it will accept it until its demise.
No, we have Copper.
And its imperative for use in its ability to change certain fields of influence to create new minerals/compounds. By introducing current compounds into the intersecting fields of specifically angled copper based field generators, we can (Somehow) create new elements (of which i have not been given information past this point)