>>636391

Perhaps there are many here who were red-pilled long, long ago.

Novel suggestion: Why not simply attempt to educate yourself beyond the history that the Democrats (Bolshevik Communists) claimed to be the truth. Hypothetically speaking: Even if you determined it to not be factual, would that not be your best means of arguing against those here who are pushing the truth?

Try this one on for size: Hey Anon, during WW2 we fought for the wrong team! Now when I make that statement, does something not scream out in your mind that I am wrong. If I simply had my facts mixed up a bit, then why is your mind compelling you to attempt to discredit what I (we) say, yet without providing any facts what so ever? Is that not the very definition of a pre-programed response?

Chew on that for a bit before responding.