Anonymous ID: c4cc9d April 29, 2019, 10 p.m. No.6367974   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8175 >>8292 >>8440 >>8525 >>8561 >>8592 >>8615 >>8629

Anon here has an interdasting post....

>>6365828 (pb)

 

I suspect the 4-10-20 catch is on the mark, but I think these are not date markers. Instead, I think we are supposed to read these all together....

 

Step back... there are actually four posts of the same flag image by Q. I caught an angle on the other two just recently by looking into the RR stuff...

 

The first flag post seems basically to be just a marker, with a random filename, on 12 Nov 2017.

 

Then the second flag post comes with a ONE minute delta after a post related to RR's departure and "red line", that Q "sort of" reposts on 24 April 2019. The point of that is to link the RR departure with the Q "red carpet rollout". RR is a white hat and part of the rollout. The flag pic is renamed to FREEDOM_.png.

Full set of posts on that:

>>6364221 (pb)

Most relevant:

>>6350794 (pb)

tl;dr: the SECOND flag pic is being linked to the PRIOR Q drop, and it is also being linked to the Q "red carpet rollout"

 

Now look at the third flag pic, on 4/10/18.

The delta with the prior drop is 17 min. That's just confirming that we've got the delta thing right... the flag pics ARE aligned with previous drops.

In this case, the prior drop includes the "Fellow patriots... snowball is rolling" passage and a link to "This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected". Q has posted that text several times, and the video link MANY times, and it is also tied into the "Flight 93 Election" theme and the public rollout of Q.

 

Now check out the fourth flag pic on 4/20/18. I don't see anything significant with the delta, but no problem, as we've got that down. The prior pic this time is "We are Q!" and WWG1WGA.jpg. NOICE! This ALSO fits with the public rollout theme.

 

So... it looks like flag pics 2, 3 and 4 are ALL being tied to immediately prior drops linked to the public Q rollout.

 

Now step back to the 4 in 4,10,20. It is a cannon shot. Is this "the shot heard around the world"? I think it fits.

 

As for all the "technical" stuff on 5/4, I suspect this is linked to Q setting up a "closed" board to post when the SHTF. Shills and newfags will run rampant...

 

It looks like the 4,10,20 theme in May 2019 is not a set of date markers, but rather a thematic collection. And I suspect it has been ACTIVATED by the RR departure...

 

(Suspect there is more to dig on this... might come back to it....)

Anonymous ID: c4cc9d April 29, 2019, 10:23 p.m. No.6368175   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8291

>>6367974

Followup on NOICE anon catch:

>>6365828 (pb)

Anon also notes the SKY EVENT post by Q+...

 

Actually "Sky Event" appears in TWO drops... BOTH linked to the 4-10-20 theme.

One is by Q+ on 5/TEN/18... and the other is by Q on 4/19/18=Lexington/Concord="the shot heard around the world"=cannon post on 5/4

 

And the EVENT checks out.....

http://blogs.esa.int/rocketscience/2019/04/25/hypothetical_impact/

 

This simulated asteroid impact event started on... 4/29...

And the main site promises ROLLING COVERAGE (= "red carpet rollout")

 

But dig deeper... is this related to some of the utmost cabal fuckery... were they plotting a mass extinction event tied to a fake alien invasion... Q has suggested this very obliquely and I think some Q "Anon" postings dive deeper into this....

 

Still... "the pill must be easy to swallow" and maybe this is all just a cue for hardcore Anons...

 

(It seems Killary is holding a book by Paul Davies on alien contact...)

Anonymous ID: c4cc9d April 29, 2019, 10:40 p.m. No.6368291   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8303

>>6368175

Here's an alternate interpretation… as opposed to the "sky event" angle…

Maybe 5/4 is a prep for 5/5… the date for the Daytime Emmy's. (Q: They think you will follow the STARS.)

Q does note the Emmy's as a "red carpet event" date….

Then we get a LOT of Q-rollout-related posts on 9/17/18 with Q recalling the "red carpet" Emmy's…

And note that May 5 = 5/5 = 5:5 seems to fit the "message received" interpretation of 5:5. Will Anons then get a signal that must be properly received? Should we get ready?