>>637248

THIS!

I typed out a comment to OP but didn't want to keep harping on about it.

This shit is a BIG DEAL, though, fags.

>>637284

I'm talking notable posts in general: we can't have 10-odd bread gaps in its update.

It's just not how citizen investigations are done.

This is how information gets lost to the majority.

Now I have to go back and re-read last bread. Fancy linking the post, anon?

>>637437

Good job, anon. We need more doing this.

Advice: don't >just memes or "ty, bakers".

Is someone's namefagging, it's deffo not them.

And you'll need to >the important information post, not the one replying "THIS!!!" to it.

Thanks for putting the effort it. The "Notable Posts" will thank you.

>>637437

And lose the (((owl))).