Just a test to see how it looks online.
Agreed. Some of the anons get an idea, and think they are right, and everyone else is wrong.
There is no thinking involved. I never saw Q ask for any petitions. He asked for memes. He
asked us to spread the word. Maybe a petition
will help. Maybe not. But only for ME to decide
for myself.
Oh… It's king shill. When there are only 100 posts, and one anon has over 10 of them, it is
most likely the "triggershill." Just ignore the multi-post anon who called you a clown. This
is his time of day to be here. He has either a buddy or two devices on separate VPNs, so
you need to ignore both of them. If you're a regular at this time of day, you already know
about this. If you are not a regular, you will recognize TS in the future. Whether or not you
filter is your choice. Personally, I just ignore him. Do not give him any ( yous ).
532 on Qanonposts.
I'm good with everything except the conclusion. Much worse reasons to let China have 5G
control. You're the baker. Go with your gut.
You asked a question. I answered. I see no need for you to apologize. If you watch my responses,
I typically give a few facts (sometimes a well-marked opinion) and then tell the reader to come
to his own conclusion. Even when I point out shills, I don't suggest filtering. I figure anons can
think for themselves. Too many here say, "He's a clown! Filter him." Eh. I just say, "He's a clown."
He does have it wrong, but not for your reason. He has it wrong because planes generate lift
by the Bernoulli principle. It states that the higher the velocity the lower the pressure. There-
fore, the pressure on the upper part of the wing is lower than the pressure on the underside
of the wing, giving it "lift," not pushing it "up." Planes fly because they are pulled up from above.
It's called physics. Lots of mathematics in it. It works every time, we just don't always understand
how it works, so we come to wrong conclusions.
Post in the resignations thread. The curator there has asked so he doesn't have to sift every bread
for himself.
Then please explain magnetism and its alter-ego electricity. For a bonus question, explain
light and electromagnetics. Remember, you claim that molecules are necessary, so I
expect them to be in your explanation. Please note that I am not trying to belittle you. I hope
that through this exercise you learn the folly of making any absolute statements.
That is how helicopters work. Unless the engine or gear box locks up, the blades
continue to rotate. It is called autorotation. The pilot appeared to do a great job. Usually, they
let the body of the craft counter-rotate to get a little more lift, but since it was landing in water,
it was more of a soft landing. There is a course on exiting helicopters that crash on water.
Every offshore oil rig hand needs to attend it. The course is called HUET. I am not a rig
hand, but I am very familiar with this course and its contents.
Not everything is a conspiracy. This may be an intentional act, but the water entry is not proof.
It would certainly cut down on recidivism. Don't listen to this tripe, though. Trump is not about to
implement the death penalty for street-level pushers. He is pulling another "raise the age
for buying rifles" lead for the opposition. He says
something outrageous, and they spend weeks with their heads exploding. Very good mileage
per word from the president to keep them occupied so long for so little. Stops them from
looking for fake shit to throw at him. DJT controls the narrative.
With the number of posts you have and your adversarial nature, I have not yet decided if you
are a shill or just a newfag; however I will err on the side of prudence, and just answer your implied
question. There is also momentum in the blades. Even without autorotation, they will
continue to spin for a long period of time, unless hindered by contact with something.
As I originally stated, I am not saying the crash was or was not intentional. I am, though, saying
the helicopter's soft landing was a testament to the pilot's skill more than evidence of foul play.
A helicopter flying over water should also have flotation devices on its skids to prevent sinking
and to prevent it flipping over. It appears this helicopter had neither. The disorientation from
going ass-over-teakettle when the helicopter flips could be the reason the uninitiated pasengers
were not able to release the buckle and escape. Again, see "HUET" training (Helicopter Underwater Escape Training).
Quite likely he was referring to big pharma, but he did not say big pharma. Therefore, we are
guessing his full meaning. I was merely pointing out to look at the observable results of
his words rather than extrapolating further meaning from them.
There is much too much confirmation bias on infinity chan. I am merely trying to keep the
record as straight as I can see it by pointing out extensions and conclusions that are not
warranted or shown in evidence.