>>6372642

>Note how the only one complaining about captchas thus far this bread

see anons?

get tired of complaining about this latest slide/distraction/nuisance,

and it's also used against you.

damned if you do,

damned if you don't.

wunderful

>>6372781

> If the board had shills

< If

but it does.

they do.

there were plenty posts by ebot last bread, and this one.

this imaginary scenario where they post less is completely made up

>>6372793

> has been put in place to help

of course it was.

but

what part of the

PROBLEM

REACTION

SOLUTION

tactic

has to be explained all over again for you cheerleaders to understand?

>>6372889

>Have you all become Tiresias and think everyone is a bot??

yes, they have.

fuckers have adopted Tiresias world view.

ashamed of anons bending over for bots, real and/or imaginary

>>6372908

> it means they are literally having to PAY someone to solve captcha's now. There are services that actually do this online. It is costing them more resources at the very least for a very minor inconvenience.

you don't know that

you don't know bots

you don't know who shills are and/or how they work

>>6372908

>makes people have to put a bit more thought into each post. (hopefully)

HOPEFULLY

MAYBE

WHO KNOWS

HEY LET'S IMAGINE IT'S BETTER

AND THEN COMPLAIN WHEN OTHERS DON'T SEE OUR IMAGINARY FRENS POSTING IN A PERFECT WORLD

>>6373045

the fact you present this as a "not handling 6 letters" argument… does not help your case.

>>6373081

>>6373015 6 extra letters should be no big deal

you write that as if it worked perfectly every time and as if it actually worked against enemies.

that is not proven in any way

but we do know for sure real anons have an added step to overcome to post.

fkn new BO biting on "solutions" to manufactured problems.

sucks.

>>6373307

hey remember that time

>f98db8 (31)

capchas were the new fad

>f98db8 (31)

and it prevent spam

>f98db8 (31)