Now that we have most of the report, please can Mueller tell us which context is not correct?
I call BS on the who saga. Mueller and Weissmann have sour grapes because their planned smear campaign did not turn out like they wanted. They for sure thought that the report would be very redacted, leading to a lot of doubt and rumors.
Barr and RR outplayed Mueller and Weissmann.
https://twitter.com/dcexaminer/status/1123387668648402944
Of course WaPo would not want their comrades Muslim Brotherhood to be declared a terrorist organization.
The WaPo is painfully naive and childish in their views of how the MB operates.
https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1123390855149182976
Seriously guys. This one is overplayed and tired. Move on and come up with another way to try to illegally overthrow the elected president.
https://twitter.com/CNN/status/1123392255505702912
>There is no end to the “blockade”. This will go right in to the 2020 election cycle.
True that. However, once/if Schiff and company face the music for leaking and their crimes, the house might feel different. We will see…
[Sally Yates]
disgraced former DOJ DAG.
But Yates’ own words might come back to haunt her, and soon.
An April 19 article in the New York Times, which now is backpedaling on the legimitacy of the Steele dossier in advance of the Horowitz report, speculated that the dossier was part of a Russian propaganda campaign targeting the Trump team.
“There has been much chatter among intelligence experts that Steele’s Russian informants could have been pressured to feed him disinformation,” the Times reported. Further, at the time Steele was working for Fusion GPS on Russian-sourced dirt against Trump, he also was lobbying on behalf of Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch with ties to the Kremlin.
So if Yates signed a court document that heavily relied on shady sources and a lobbyist (Steele) for a Putin-connected billionaire, who would be guilty of relying on help from a foreign adversary for political purposes? Not Donald Trump.
The imperious Yates and her accomplices might have a chance to answer that question—and others—in front of Congress in the very near future.
In response to her “Meet the Press” interview, Senator John Cornyn (R-Texas) tweeted that Yates’ actions “will certainly be part of forthcoming Senate Judiciary Committee oversight hearings on FBI/DOJ during Obama years in which she served as Deputy AG under Loretta Lynch.”
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-04-30/real-bombshells-are-about-hit-their-targets
https://twitter.com/Gettingtrump/status/1123394206561710080
>UGH SALLY YATES
>She's the only one of the assholes I've actually seen in person
>Cocktail party/business award dinner
>She emits a giant cloud of arrogance.
>I don't even know how to describe her level of bitch.
>Sociopathic bitchery
Interesting observation anon. Seems like there is a lot of that arrogance among the elites who were part of the coup conspiracy. Strzok seems like an arrogant prick too.
Godspeed patriots if you happen to be in harms way.
https://twitter.com/trish_regan/status/1123392271989211137
Hussein and coup plotters planted bugs all over the place. Would not surprise me if they bugged the WH when they left.
Also, since Strzok was trying to recruit a source/spy in the WH, who know what the hell they could have got up to while Strzok was still in the FBI.
https://twitter.com/Pink_About_it/status/1123385846533586947