Anons, this is not just about the captchas, this is about the way the mods are handling this entire issue.

In case you've forgotten THIS is why we need TRUSTWORTHY mods

remember when Q posted without a tripcode saying private comms will be important in the future? pics related.

how can Q have private comms with the board?

1. mods can privately message Q at anytime because they are BO of /patriotsfight/

2. Q can post anonymously and ONLY MODS can see their hash history and know that they are Q and act accordingly.

we don't know what the comms will be used for, maybe instructions, in which case:

WE CANNOT AFFORD TO HAVE SHITTY MODS WHO MIGHT FUCK IT UP

not even getting into the fact that the captcha was a failure, instead of being TRANSPARENT and putting this 24-hour long chaos to bed, BO/BVs are posting anonymously, mocking anons, avoiding accountability and refusing to answer questions.

just like the bewb war was about more than bewbs - the captcha war is about more than the captcha. more and more anons see that fuckery is afoot despite attempts to silence.

>>6377406

i use that term disdainfully, retard. they're acting like mods so i'm calling them mods.

>>6377397

>>6377283

>>6377387

well i'll repost it then:

——

kek it's funny because all of this started bc of the jew posts at the top of the bread

anons were complaining and the general consensus was that they were "bots", which is why the captcha was implemented. but there was a problem..

it didn't work

so we learned something "new". it's not a bot who posts them, just a spammer. and we're right back to where we started: spam is spam

any other "bots" it stopped? because i still see e-bot is posting. did we have that big of a bot problem that every single anon, including Q has to fill out a captcha for every single post? good leaders (for lack of a better word) recognize when they fuck up and adapt. 8bit did after the bewb war, which lasted half a day. BO/BV's know they fucked up and are pretending it's a success. sheep-anons who are used to being told what to think and following their leaders are now defending it. what the fuck is next?

their argument for keeping the spam was: spam is free speech and deleting it is censorship

and making it more difficult to speak freely isn't censorship?

making decisions and refusing to answer questions isn't suspect to you? do you not question the character or trustworthiness of people behaving this way or do you automatically love them because they're our dear leaders?

they promised us things would stay the same and that was the condition by which they received the keys to the board. they lied and we deserve an explanation at the very least.

>>6377454

your paranoia knows no bounds. anyone who disagrees with you is a paid shill or covert operator. get over yourself. and use the trip.

>consensus cracking

>consensus cracking

>consensus cracking

keep pretending this is a success. clearly anons are too smart for to be fooled:

>>6377453

>>6377339

>>6377407

>>6377418

>>6377459

>>6377491

looks mighty organic to me.

>>6377518, >>6377525, >>6377546 do any of you actually notice a marked decrease in "bot" activity?

syangogue satan, check

e-bot, check

patriots remember! (another who we thought was a bot), check

where are the disappearing bots? you really think they're expending more resources now? there were barely any bots to begin with. it's always been human spam and shilling.

basically BO/BV's

>ignored the real problem

>created a false bot problem to deflect from the real problem

>created a "solution" to fix the bot problem

<real problem still exists

<solution isn't really a solution if it inconveniences anons and eventually Q too

>>6377538

he didn't create the board, so no it's not his board. he just inherited somebody else's board and was ill equipped to handle the responsibilities that come with it.

>>6377613

>>6377596

what evidence do you have that there was "programmatic gaming of the system"?

i don't notice a single change to the board. why implement this now? did something change? was there a bot attack? was this a decision made by the BO or did all BV's agree to it? why weren't anons informed or consulted? what makes you think they won't develop some kind of workaround if they're hellbent on "programmatic gaming of the system"?

and what exactly does "programmatic gaming of the system" even entail?

i repeat, if there is no discernible change, there were not as many bots as you thought and you were wrong. it's ok to admit it.

what you deem "consensus cracking" was never done by bots because it's still happening

(i.e. anons agreeing with each other organically)

and human shills agreeing with each other

what has changed?

why am i supposed to pat you on the back?

thank you for you anonymous explanation though. i'm just going to pretend it was professional, official and happened 24 hours ago.

too little, too late. you're losing anons' trust for your poor handling of this.

>>6377635

how is that relevant? i'm not mega jew. your iden skills are nonexistent. keep misfiring at anons, it's doing wonders for you.

>>6377745

it's not just about the captcha. it's their handling of it which has caused all this unnecessary drama. see my other posts this bread. keep laughing. only sheep love their own subversion.

you should be pausing and reflecting without a captcha. sad that you need board staff to help you control your own shitposting..

>>6377838

>>6377745

and what's different? not a single person has been able to intelligent refute anything i've said. what is specifically different to you? what bots are missing? what specific spamming has decreased?

>>6377858

well said, anon. none of us have any real insight into how this decision was made. all we're asking for is transparency, if not a reversal in policy. apparently that's asking for too much. we're not supposed to question the people who run things, that's not what good little sheep do!

>>6377885

meant for

>>6377870

as for you >>6377858

you want me to sit here and type about my personal and professional successes? is that how you're going to deflect from the issue at hand? do you have any real argument to make? fucking brainless..

the only argument anyone ever makes is

"you're crying"

>you care more than i do and i can't see your point of view because i lack foresight so i'm going to paint all opinionated anons as crybaby shills because ad hominem attacks are always successful

SAD

>>6377923

Q is working towards the 0:00:00 delta, pics related

this will likely be an activation signal imo

only 2 posts say "maybe one day"

the one from november 2017 was out of context and apparently not in response to anything else that was said in the thread. i wasn't there at the time but i read through the archives. this is just a theory of mine, but regardless, the captcha will make reaching 0:00:00 hell.