>>6378100

i've been thinking the same lately, anon

i have a theory of sorts that "the plan" is an 8 year plan and each post corresponds to a different year. that's why some seem out of context. like the brave new world one. that clearly was not happening when it was posted and i doubt it will be relevant this fall either, because it's too soon. it could be a 2 year 3 year delta who knows.

have been meaning to go through all of the crumbs and organize "chronologically" based on the general timeline Q has given us but it would be extremely time intensive and irl leaves me with little time as it is.

>>6378143

wow i didn't even notice that. i have never seen it so low at 11pm. kek, anons are lazier than i thought..

>>6378185

oh yea that too..

>>6378299

yep, the very definition of sheep: incapable of thinking ahead or thinking critically, incapable of questioning those in positions of power, mocking and making fun of those who ask questions

>>6378344

it didn't make notables bc no one knew it was a BO/BV talking, you retard. are you serious right now?

thank you for this, again anonymous, post though

baker, notable - BO?/BV? explains captcha decision

>>6378344

>spammers

Spammers are allowed, now they have to work for it instead of getting a free lunch.

no, more accurately. there used to be free lunch for everyone and now EVERYONE pays not just the spammers.

if no filters, then why not just leave shit as it is and make this your policy going forward? clearly it is unpopular and ineffective.

>>6378379

you really really think they're paying more money to "fill out 6 letters"

it's still the same human shills. why would they be paid more to fill out a captcha per post. even if they did, how would you know for sure to be propping that up as a success? it's an assumption. you're basing your entire opinion on an assumption.

>>6378412

how do you know that? it doesn't take THAT much longer to post.. max 30 seconds if you're having difficulties. again, assumption.

>>6378429

kek but really

makes more sense that it would be a clock-in/clock-out type thing rather than pay-per-post

but either way, who knows..

>>6378465

i know, anon

bc legitimate anons don't want to deal with that shit

but people who get paid will obviously still be here posting regardless

>>6378507

what advantage would the heads up have given the enemy? ok shills brace yourselves for more typing? kek. let's not kid ourselves.

>information warfare

not real warfare.

shills couldn't prevent this either way and a heads up would've been good for anons and prevented the 24 hour slide. thank god it's finally over now that we have a semi-official explanation from BO?BV?

i for one feel slightly better knowing the decision was unanimous, carefully considered, and not done for lulz as the trololol video made it seem.

>>6378515

>>6378515

>>6378515

>>6378515

>Why are you accepting that who you're talking with as anon is BO?

>Why are you accepting that who you're talking with as anon is BO?

>Why are you accepting that who you're talking with as anon is BO?

because what other choice do we have, anon? they literally refuse to make a real announcement on this for the sole reason that anons were asking for it. i know penshitlord at least is so paranoid he probably has 15 theories cooked up for why shills are forcing him to use his tripcode

occam's razor is completely lost on these people

so for now, we just have to guess when a BV/BO is talking