>>6383417 (pb)
Or possibly more accurately, did not support Clinton. That doesn't necessarily mean "supporting Trump".
>>6383417 (pb)
Or possibly more accurately, did not support Clinton. That doesn't necessarily mean "supporting Trump".
Why would he be angry?
zerohedge isn't maga.
don't care
nah
why?
bunga bunga. whatever.
I'll vote for him if he runs in 2024 (and I sincerely hope he does).
This pic, tho? Eeeeehhh….
The Mueller report wasn't vetted? What informs your statement?
No. Am not reading the image you posted. I really do NOT care for that "source".
However, I'm curious why you think I should read it.
Am having problems understanding something, because I didn't type "evidence"?
If it went into the report, I assume the evidence supporting or refuting it was, in fact, vetted.
There.