>>6383843

> evedince is there that the democrats are "genocidal pedofiles"

Your friend was incorrect or you misunderstood him. It's not "the democrats". There are a small number of people in both parties and many more outside of politics who seem to have predilections that are not entirely legal.

>>6383978

>Has /CM/ implemented extra security due to the NZ/Synagogue shooters?

No, it was done mainly to hinder bots. And by requiring a small amount of effort to post, the shills get far fewer (Yous). Since the get paid by the You they're pissed.