or also, instead of complaining and still not having contemplated the probability of projection on your part, you could go grab the link from catalog/index and post it when you don't see it showing up to your liking.
>by some chance
a reality tv star pol outsider didn't make it in from nowhere by a fluke to begin with.
not too worried about that (more the long, long, loooong game/same)
>would it be hard for baker to post the fresh bread to facilitate anons work best?
nah, but shit happens. capchas don't help there
>is there any reason why 'anons' would fight for not having this post?
nah, but you're doing it way wrong. condescendingly shaming and chiving bakers ain't getting you nowhere, it's just nasty.
>do these tiny little shilly attempts show of how desperate DS and shills are?
ohno, it's one of you, then
oh, absolutely.
we might not want them to see his landslide victory coming… i guess ideally they should, but since they're so slow to grow
just like regular chickens
i know, but it's not technically a denial, being just an expression.
legalese-wise, it's interesting.
an old trick, it's like when politicians go "what? oh these allegations are so ludicrous they do not deserve an answer"