>>6391335

>>6391393

>>6391393

Can you explain this, or are you just going to ignore it and run away like a little bitch?

>>6391393

>>6391416

Um, hellllooooooooooo? Did you fucking hear me?

>>6391416 (me)

I love it

All these critical thinkers here on the bread and not a single fucking answer.

>>6391516

Nice - but sad - try.

If those 6 didn’t think RR was going to deliver, then why didn’t they harangue the necessary D party votes to block his nomination?

RR remains a white hat until we can get a fucking answer to this

>>6391558

What in the actual fuck is this? Bye faggot.

RR = WHITE HAT until proven otherwise

>>6391569

“Basically”

“Alluded to”

Tell me why known shitheads didn’t want RR confirmed DAG. Faggot.

>>6391575

>Those 6 knew because they still had full control of all the intel concerning RR (which [they] would know anyway) through channels are are as of this date, closed to [them].

THIS is the fucking answer I’m getting? Excuse me, can I please get an anon with an actual brain in their skull to tell me why 6 Dems and 0 Reps voted NO on RR?

Thanks bai

>>6391588

Look anon

>>6391618

Oh, thanks for letting me know that I can continue doing whatever the fuck I want on this free speech board, step dad.

>>6391632

If RR was a black hat, why not A SINGLE nay vote from Republicans?