>>6391798 lb
>Bitches about 'sources', yet posts BS pics without understanding perspective and field of view.
It's not about 'muh discovery channel' as a source.
It's about the content in the video.
Obviously, you haven't even bothered to view, let alone comprehend, said content.
As for your pic @250MI;
What's the circumference of the planet at the equator?
250MI is what percentage of that?
Neck yourself, FETard.