>>6392173, pb
>>6392350, pb
>>6392396, pb
>>6392566 pb
Baker left out the other side of the argument,
Coincidence?
>>6392494 pb
>>6392521 pb
>>6392529 pb
>>6392632 pb
>>6392680 pb
I am so gratful for this Board and the great prayer service anyone who was listening in to POTUS at the White House today would've participated in at home
Typical the dude who skews the evidence doesnt' even acknowledge the Prayer event [Exorcism, in reality]
I'm so grateful because Baker and people who like to censor opposite views, that are in fact endorsed by "q" posts [right or wrong; the real reason we know it is from the evidence; not that "Q" confirm. But they did confirm]
I 've been thrown off of too many boards and this is the time I'd be kicked off, if the Baker and his cohorts COULD do it
The purpose of this board is that they can not.
The shills for "White hats for M. and R." have been here for a year[s] so I assume they are entrenched.
Check the "Q" post
Phew.
Who are you. I have no idea.
Provide links.
Are you saying all the links Baker made Notable misrepresented you.
I read them all. And all the responses.
LIAR
If you have posts somewhere else?
Point to it.
I didn't even notice what you wrote; it was so lame; I didn't even think it needed to be refuted,
FRAUD
You use arrogance and "Oh course" -ness in your "arguments" which are very weak.
If you think you will bully others into accepting your stupid BS, got back to Twitter, where you have all the followers.
But you won't get a following here.
>>6392427 pb
I remember that from back then
Yeah, the Bushie crew desperate for fascism.
They would do the same to Barr if they could.
Comey forced Ashcroft to back down.
Ashcroft was not 100% white hat
kek
He made a lot of money afterward selling data and other things to DHS
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ashcroft