>>6393556 pb
"Payment in Full"
That doesn't tell you when or how.
Or how much.
That's means they are going to let him off.
Go home when all the others get charged?
NOPE
And why do you need "Q" to confirm?
That's BS. You're supposed to be able to think for yourself. Not run to "Q" like it's your mommy
>>6392494 pb
>You have nothing then.
interlocutor asks for proof, Answer is a brush off.
No attempt to bolster foolish argument.
>Only conclusion I can draw.
Another lie: How about: Just making your arguement. What are you afraid of?
>Otherwise you'd be trying to convince me.
What? No one gives a fuck what you think. How arrogant.
>But you completely missed the point I was making, so I'll dumb it down for you.
>I don't care what color RM "has always been".
More arrogance.
Really. Past performance and character doesn't predict future.
I never heard that before.
Unless, the person confesses, admits wrong, and makes amends.
We see none of this from Rosen
In fact he's constantly arrogant and smirking, [like those who support him?]
Check the body language analysis done on him
He insulted Jim Jordan
Is that part of the "act" too; if so, dudes in wrong profession.
>He was probably trapped, against his will, into the swamp.
I see "Probably" That's why you are so insistant and insulting to those who think otherwise?
NOPE
>But in his final report he donned a white hat.
How's that? Isn't his behavior just as easily explained by "He's forced"?
Isn't that theory consonant with the look on his face while standing behind Barr during the summary of the report?
>That itself is evidence that the pieces around him forced the action.
alright. But that still doesn't support you theory that he's a "white hat" unless you want to change the definition of the word.
>POTUS is winning.
Non Sequiteur. Time waster. Bread spoiler
>What do you call a man,
>standing behind a loaded cannon
>who, instead of firing at his target
>takes the ammo out, removes the firing pin
There was nothing there to fire, fool.
He was stopped from making up crimes and using them.
He was forced to stop. He's not a good guy.
>and dismantles the whole thing?
>: "muh still black hat…"
But you don't even have an argument!
>It's so obvious I feel bad having to explain it for you.
>I'm sure you could have figured it out yourself.
No we needed you to lie to us. And make us believe black is white.
That one skill of the spooks really goes far.
But not on this board.