Anonymous ID: b01bbb March 12, 2018, 8:46 a.m. No.639719   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Dropped this on a faceberg group that Im trying to redpill. Anything to add anons?

 

"You supply the pictures and I'll furnish the war" - Hearst

 

That's a lot of power for one man to wield.

Hearst only printed the news. One way communication.

Consider how much power he would have wielded if he could influence both sides of the conversation.

 

Zuckerberg

Schmidt

Dorsey

Bezos

 

Can they influence your search results?

Can they promote "positive" results?

Can they throttle "unacceptable" content?

Can they promote "better" content?

Can they delist "unacceptable" products?

Can they promote "better" products?

 

Can they shape the way that the world looks to us?

 

Is there any way that this is a good thing?

Anonymous ID: b01bbb March 12, 2018, 9:08 a.m. No.639898   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9928

>>639856

 

That's what makes a tarmac tape perfect. The seed is already planted in the normie mind that something crooked habbened there.

 

It's somethign they can swallow. Plus, it'll come from the N essay. That makes it above reproach.

Anonymous ID: b01bbb March 12, 2018, 9:16 a.m. No.639959   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9991

>>639928

 

If there's audio of bill offering lynch the SC deal, that's infinitely more interesting to the public than U1.

 

That leads to murder and serious corruption. It's sexier and the public loves a scandal that's easy to understand and fits into sound bites.

 

… but I admit that I'm guessing and have been wrong about damn near everything so far.