Anonymous ID: 36bf9f May 2, 2019, 7:36 p.m. No.6399054   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9069 >>9210 >>9257 >>9308

Checkmate.

How President Trump’s legal team outfoxed Mueller

 

When the Mueller Report was released on April 18th, most commentators focused on the “explosive” factual allegations. But other than the shocking revelation that the President once used an expletive in private, very few of those facts were novel; most were leaked long ago.

 

In June 2018, Bill Barr, then in private practice at Kirkland & Ellis, wrote a detailed legal memorandum to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. This memo came to light in December, when Barr was nominated for Attorney General.

 

At the end of Volume II of the Mueller Report, however, there were 20 pages of genuinely new material.

 

There, the former FBI director turned Special Counsel Robert Mueller defended his “Application of Obstruction-Of-Justice Statutes To The President.” These overlooked 20 pages were dedicated to defending Mueller’s interpretation of a single subsection of a single obstruction-of-justice statute: 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2).

 

That’s quite strange, but you know what’s stranger still?

 

In June 2018, Bill Barr, then in private practice at Kirkland & Ellis, wrote a detailed legal memorandum to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. This memo came to light in December, when Barr was nominated for Attorney General.

 

The subject was Mueller’s interpretation of the aforementioned 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2).

 

When Barr’s memo first appeared, prominent liberal legal commentators were perplexed. Georgetown Law professor Marty Lederman wrote at Just Security:

 

“[T]he first huge and striking problem with Barr’s memo is that he unjustifiably makes countless assumptions about what Mueller is doing…From all that appears, Barr was simply conjuring from whole cloth a preposterously long set of assumptions about how Special Counsel Mueller was adopting extreme and unprecedented-within-DOJ views about every pertinent question and investigatory decision.”

 

At Lawfare, Mikhaila Fogel and Benjamin Wittes wrote:

 

“[I]t is not an exaggeration to say that Barr’s entire memo is predicated on two broad assumptions: first, that he knows Mueller’s legal theory, and second, that he understands the fact pattern that Mueller is investigating… Neither assumption is, in our judgment, warranted. Unlike Barr, we don’t purport to know what Mueller’s obstruction theory is.”

 

But now that we have the Mueller Report, things look very different……

 

Rest here: https://humanevents.com/2019/05/01/checkmate/

 

ANONS NEED TO READ THIS… Q PROOF