Break it down = Reduce to simplest terms (Explain it so a 6th Grader can understand it)
Back it up = Prove it
Some light reading for you
The Emerald Tablets of Thoth
https://www.crystalinks.com/emeraldprefacebw.html
The history of the tablets translated in the following pages is strange and beyond the belief of modern scientists. Their antiquity is stupendous, dating back some 36,000 years B.C. The writer is Thoth, an Atlantean Priest-King, who founded a colony in ancient Egypt after the sinking of the mother country.
He was the builder of the Great Pyramid of Giza, erroneously attributed to Cheops. In it he incorporated his knowledge of the ancient wisdom and also securely secreted records and instruments of ancient Atlantis.
For some 16,000 years, he ruled the ancient race of Egypt, from approximately 52,000 B.C. to 36,000 B.C. At that time, the ancient barbarous race among which he and his followers had settled had been raised to a high degree of civilization.
Thoth was an immortal, that is, he had conquered death, passing only when he willed and even then not through death. His vast wisdom made him ruler over the various Atlantean colonies, including the ones in South and Central America.
When the time came for him to leave Egypt, he erected the Great Pyramid over the entrance to the Great Halls of Amenti, placed in it his records, and appointed guards for his secrets from among the highest of his people.
In later times, the descendants of these guards became the pyramid priests, by which Thoth was deified as the God of Wisdom, The Recorder, by those in the age of darkness which followed his passing. In legend, the Halls of Amenti became the underworld, the Halls of the gods, where the soul passed after death for judgment.
Who am I?
Who are we?
Who is they?
Where am I?
What am I?
When am I?
Why am I?
I am a soul created by the Creator in the body of a man on the planet earth in my time. I came from somewhere and I am going somewhere. I am here now, preparing for my next world. I am one of many, universally located. Light = Life
A no count snap, straight up the Middle
Not when the Center touches the ball
When the QB says Ready
[OnReady]
Who taught the Jews these things? Who "civilized" the Jews? Everything is cyclical. Repeating patterns.
We all came from somewhere. Something created everything. Why can't the Devil also be an Alien[from somewhere else]?
The love of money
Is the root of all evil
Who paid the first wages in recorded history? (Hint: It was "The Egyptians" who paid wages to those who built the pyramids.) They traded their time and energy and skills for money. They spent their lives glorifying the light of another, instead of living as their own light, ever endeavoring for more. And down man fell.
Poynter forced to scrap 'unreliable news' list targeting conservative outlets after outcry
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/poynter-unreliable-sources-list
A journalism watchdog has been forced to scrap a list of “unreliable” news sources because, as it turns out, the list wasn’t reliable.
The Poynter Institute, a journalism nonprofit organization, initially released a list of more than 500 “unreliable” news outlets purportedly “built from pre-existing databases compiled by journalists, fact-checkers and researchers around the country.”
But a number of prominent conservative-leaning outlets were included in the “unreliable” category, including The Washington Examiner, Washington Free Beacon, Daily Caller and other publications that employ scores of journalists covering Congress, elections, the White House and more. The index was created with the help of an employee for the Southern Poverty Law Center.
The walk-back was gradual. First, the authors reversed the inclusion of The Washington Examiner after further review. But the paper's executive editor, Philip Klein, complained that the group was still urging an advertiser blacklist for those outlets still included – calling the process behind the list opaque and arbitrary.
Poynter’s managing editor, Barbara Allen, posted a mea culpa Thursday as the backlash built.
“On Tuesday, April 30, Poynter posted a list of 515 'unreliable' news websites, built from pre-existing databases compiled by journalists, fact-checkers and researchers around the country. Our aim was to provide a useful tool for readers to gauge the legitimacy of the information they were consuming,” the statement read.
“Soon after we published, we received complaints from those on the list and readers who objected to the inclusion of certain sites, and the exclusion of others. We began an audit to test the accuracy and veracity of the list, and while we feel that many of the sites did have a track record of publishing unreliable information, our review found weaknesses in the methodology.
“We detected inconsistencies between the findings of the original databases that were the sources for the list and our own rendering of the final report.”