-if by regular "secular" killing, it's an air-blow DESIGNED TO LIMIT SUFFERING as much as possible, ie animal doesn't have time to realize/feel any pain.
-if KOSHER or HALAL, the animal is made to bleed out and die slowly, ensuring BY DESIGN that it suffers for hours.
you tell me which is more moral, anon
>That lets me know I’m right, ’cause I don’t know nothing he’s been right on since he been here.
soooo many ways this logic can be turned against him, egad.
>Halal and Kosher is sick!
yup.
if only normies knew just about that single detail…
they see every damn meat in the market being kosher/halal : "oh, same difference, why not? we accept and respect every religion, we're nice people."
…so you don't mind millions more animals bleeding to a slow painful death because the Blood God wants Suffering?
nice
those may be valid questions, but the goalpost moved.
considering that there are currently untold numbers of animals killed, and will continue to be so in the future (until/if any those questions are considered/resolved),
how is choosing between a method that limits suffering and a method that ensures it not a serious moral choice?
AMEN
so "grabbing by the pussy" is wrong
UNLESS you are a very very rich billionaire - ohwait
>EVERY fucking point of the Left is contradicted by one of their other points…..
that's how you argue against them, by using their own logic and asking how you are supposed to follow/obey
>to move toward compassion, love, light, Justice, Truth and away from darkness, deception, evil, and cruelty
and in the meantime, favoring a painless death over a bloody drawn-out extension of suffering is still more humane than accepting blood god sacrifices as normal.
>deepfakes
do they still don't even bother to produce convincing examples?
still riding that Peele Obama vid?
>never once has he flashed any symbolism or stood for photo ops with one eye blocked.
of fuck's sake…
using the absence of ILLUMINATI LARPING as proof, come on