Anonymous ID: 7bb529 May 3, 2019, 10:01 a.m. No.6403235   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3322 >>3366

Good thread on the dueling intrepretations of 18 USC § 1512(c)(2).

https://twitter.com/RoscoeBDavis1/status/1124059671814451207

 

Careful with Mueller. This may be the bait to get the Republicans to agree to let him testify.

Not like he hasn't played this trick before (letter to Barr).

Anonymous ID: 7bb529 May 3, 2019, 10:24 a.m. No.6403448   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6403366

In the House, correct. But after the circus in the HJC the last few days, that does not appear to be the ideal venue for Mueller's testimony for the Dims.

Anonymous ID: 7bb529 May 3, 2019, 10:45 a.m. No.6403628   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6402924 /lb

>>6402967

>http://archive.fo/lpilM

Not sure if they're married, but they do have a very close relationship. Great find anon.

 

http://www.softpanorama.org/Skeptics/Political_skeptic/Two_party_system_as_poliarchy/Intelligence_agencies_influence/fbi_and_cia_contractor_crowdstike.shtml