>>6403603
"We must do all we can in the name of the American people to ensure that when the Trump administration ends we have as robust a democracy to hand to our children as was handed to us," Nadler said.
House Democrats say Barr has led what amounts to a cover-up, publicly ruling that Trump did not obstruct justice while keeping Mueller’s detailed evidence secret for nearly a month. On Wednesday, Barr snubbed a Democratic subpoena for Mueller’s unredacted findings and underlying evidence, and he skipped a Thursday hearing meant to discuss those findings, complaining about Democrats' plan to use committee counsel to question him.
“What we are witnessing is the slow loss of our democratic republic and we can either allow it to happen or we can stand up against it,” Rep. Hakeem Jeffries of New York, chairman of the House Democratic Caucus, said of Barr. “We are not going to allow the notion of a presidential dictatorship to take hold.”
The White House has mounted a campaign to aggressively combat House Democrats — both by defending Barr and repeating calls for Nadler and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff to resign.
Steven Groves, a deputy press secretary handling oversight issues for the White House, held a conference call with Trump surrogates after Barr finished testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee Wednesday, claiming that no Democrats managed to “lay a glove on him,” according to a person familiar with the call.
Trump also went on television Wednesday night to praise Barr's performance, saying "he did a fantastic job" and dismissing calls for his resignation. "He's an outstanding man, he's an outstanding legal mind," Trump told Fox Business. "He performed incredibly well today."
Legal experts — even those who are no fans of Barr — cast doubt on the notion that he could be nailed for perjuring himself to the House.
“The attorney general’s testimony yesterday, with his flagrant obfuscations and open contempt for his questioners, shamed the office he holds,” said Sam Buell, a former federal prosecutor and law professor at Duke University. “However, as a legal matter, it can be miles from obfuscation to provable perjury, and from displaying contempt for one's questioners to being held in contempt.”
“It is going to take more to dislodge him, if that is what the Democrats in the House are after,” added Buell, who worked with Mueller prosecutor Andrew Weissmann on the case against Enron executives.
Sol Wisenberg, a former deputy on Ken Starr’s independent counsel investigation into President Bill Clinton, called it “suicidal” for Democrats to consider impeaching Barr and said there’s no conceivable way his remarks to the House could be construed as perjury.
“It’s total bullshit,” Wisenberg said. “In fact, it’s unmitigated bullshit … It’s not a misleading statement. It’s not even Clintonian.”
Still, Democrats are scouring their history books in search of ways to hold Barr accountable. Some have even floated the notion that they could dust off a little-used congressional power known as “inherent contempt," the ability of lawmakers to fine and even jail officials deemed to be in contempt of Congress.
“We haven’t used it since Teapot Dome; doesn’t mean we can’t. I’m all for reviving it," said Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), a member of the House Oversight Committee, referring to the Warren Harding administration bribery scandal from the early 1920s. "We have, as you know, jurisdiction over the District of Columbia, and they have a beautiful jail with plenty of room. So I think that would be just perfect for some of these people to contemplate their actions.”