>>640338 (last bread)
>you may want to screenshot my post so one day when you see it for the truth, you can reflect that retard comment back to you. peace and wake up soon.
Save the antagonism. I was agreeing with you, If you care to re_reed the thread & see that.
Anons' theories that are unconfirmed get anons excited → Anons take their own homegrown hopium → Anons don't get what they expected → Hopium wears off → Anons blame Q for not delivering on their own mistaken theories → Q drops → Anons' theories that are unconfirmed get anons excited → Rinse and repeat
Confession: I had to look up the word heteronormative because I've never had the need to use it and wanted to be sure that it means what it looks like it means: natural. Now that I'm sure, Why TF is this woman even talking? They are literally trying to change history
is only one reason why no one should be falling for today's clown choice of podesta-arresta (de)bait. Unconfirmed theories agreed upon by a few anons are taken into record & consideration by clowns, only so that they may later use them to try and prove EVERYTHING wrong when the "dates" and "predictions" don't happen. Your own ideas, right or wrong, are being used against you. Wake up to the mini-larps that anons are inadvertently creating.
Unfortunately so, I'd rather be wrong on this one. Clowns can't WAIT for anon's predictions to fall flat, so that they can throw them in our faces. It's sadly effective
PRECISELY! Using anons own incorrect "predictions" against them. If effective, anons that leave are anons that probably aren't needed (lukewarm). Anons that are too busy waiting to actually HELP
Sounds like a plan, puke first though