>>6404630

I've been saying it for some time now. Q has been saying it for some time, as well.

Mueller and Rosenstein were the final interlock for the launch. The final hold on the mission. Everything else going on in the background was setup and staging.

President Trump is playing "king of the hill" and moving people in and out of positions who either think they are getting away with a con, or who are needed to ensure integrity of the judicial/legal process. This is why President Trump is able to pretend like he's not really doing anything. In many ways - he isn't. Simply him being there and not being corrupt or handled by the deep state allows the system to self-purge as it was supposed to, all along.

The big show does require some setup and staging, and that is what Mueller and Rosenstein were for. Once they are cleared, the mission is in final countdown to T=0 - which is the FISA declass. But that is only the start of the mission. The mission timer then begins to count up with events on it, afterward.

Anyway - another one that is going to blow some minds is Kushner.

Remember how the media went nuts about how Trump may have forced the issue regarding Kushner's security clearance? The snippet from the Press Secretary included an oddly specific comment regarding whether or not the issue of security clearances on the President's transition team (leaks) were leveraged/forced.

Just saying. Someone had to put Manafort into the campaign.

>>6404987

You know, it was obvious Mueller and Rosenstein were on the side of POTUS.

It should be rather obvious that Kushner is the leak and the one who set Manafort into the campaign.

I suppose it is possible the leak could be from someone else - but the leaks were from the Adjudication team.

I honestly do not understand the confusion people have with all of this.

You could argue it might have been Bannon, who was replaced, as well - though I would have to cross-reference the leaks with the dates people were part of the team, and I am honestly not that autistic on the matter.

The DNI guy being the source of the leaks is too high profile. Even if he was a bad actor, he wouldn't be the one sourcing leaks. He would approve someone for receipt of memos who would then either be the leaker or be the one to accidentally leave the door unlocked. He is not going to directly source a leak except as a last, desperate action. Even then, if he has kept his gloves on while doing dirty work, he can simply leave them at the job site and go home clean. The people at that level are not stake holders in the game who need to win or lose - they are people who play the game and duck out when it's time to get to minimum safe distance.

Like Mattis. Sure - he seems to have given the bird on the way out, but I highly doubt he was doing much more than playing the part of a general who gets to take on higher authority and enjoying the fact that for a mercenary, war is a business and in the middle east, business is good. He could have been worse, but probably not in the criminal/traitor way under a strict legal definition.

My money is on Kushner. He needed Hillary to win in order to protect him from the big dick of congressional investigations that would investigate him in all 30 holes for why he put Manafort on the campaign as an FBI setup for treason.

By the time he was looking at a Trump victory, he had no other options but to try and get Trump impeached. As for why he would go along with it - not only does Soros own his start, Ivanka's businesses are potentially threatened by sanctions against Deripaska, because of her friendship with the ex wife of one of Deripaska's partners. If "Russian Collusion" became a thing, it was almost a guarantee that Ivanka's business assets would be transfered to him to avoid sanctions - and then the battery of indictments and false testimony by the special counsel would send her to jail.

Remember, if getting married was "just good business" - then so, too, would saying "sucks to be you" when she got sent to jail on false charges after having her assets frozen.