as an experiment people should start tweeting Shakespeare quotes, some of the more . . . expressive and algorical ones . . . or stage directions of a play. Or lines from movies.
How does Twitter even know what is violent, what is not violent, what is triggering? what is benign?
it's a fraud to think that they could know.
Clearly their needed to be over as a gatekeeper.
They have failed.
for example the 'definitions' we find on line: what proof do we have from , say , google, that what they define is a definition even written by an English speaker (if the lang is English?).
we get them as 'experts' but they have no credentials.
and someone who is well followed is blocked based upon their misunderstandings about alegorical battle references?
they are pathetic.
they must not remain as anyone's digital overlords.
the system must be redisigned so that their agenda does not interfere with the public's right to communication and free assembly (both physically, and in chat groups of internet, or in formats such as we see in social media).