Anonymous ID: 566cec May 3, 2019, 8:12 p.m. No.6408617   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6408576

It's so common, in RI, and in the NE in general, for the Democrats to run these fraudulent voter lists.

It's been going on for as long as I can remember.

the smug know-it-alls when you go to vote. They know your vote doesn't really count for anything.

Leauge of Women Socialists

``

Anonymous ID: 566cec May 3, 2019, 8:19 p.m. No.6408690   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6408658

could the voters sue the state to take the voter roles and the elections away from the . . . . civil servants who run it now?

if it's true that they have more than 100% of eligible voters registered than the census shows . . . maybe a lot of people just moved there but . . . the flaw in that is only people from RI, for the most part, ever want to live there. Or they marry in.

other than that who would move there?

Anonymous ID: 566cec May 3, 2019, 8:32 p.m. No.6408792   🗄️.is 🔗kun

as an experiment people should start tweeting Shakespeare quotes, some of the more . . . expressive and algorical ones . . . or stage directions of a play. Or lines from movies.

 

How does Twitter even know what is violent, what is not violent, what is triggering? what is benign?

 

it's a fraud to think that they could know.

Clearly their needed to be over as a gatekeeper.

They have failed.

for example the 'definitions' we find on line: what proof do we have from , say , google, that what they define is a definition even written by an English speaker (if the lang is English?).

 

we get them as 'experts' but they have no credentials.

and someone who is well followed is blocked based upon their misunderstandings about alegorical battle references?

 

they are pathetic.

they must not remain as anyone's digital overlords.

the system must be redisigned so that their agenda does not interfere with the public's right to communication and free assembly (both physically, and in chat groups of internet, or in formats such as we see in social media).

Anonymous ID: 566cec May 3, 2019, 8:57 p.m. No.6409004   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6408930

 

the contracts are worth 42 B?

meaning that 42B in profit for whoever fills them? or?

sounds like someone set up a sweet deal and it's all burned to a cinder.

I wouldn't doubt if those idle wind farms in China aren't somehow involved through some strange green-credit-default-swap kind of allegorical relationship, like a credit default swap only with energy 'green' credits.