>>641333

You just resolved it.

The 'problem' is that many people do not believe, or do not want to have confirmed, a conspiracy against them to distort the truth and reality.

At least, not to that degree. They believe the media and politicians are relatively normal people who have the same interests in life as they do. They are just doing their job to get paid like everyone else…..

They don't understand how fundamentally different many of these 'people' in media are. And until such a time as they are willing to realize that the media is filled with social engineers who see their job as conditioning the masses, then much of what we have uncovered is going to be dismissed by them.

>>641436

Was Snowden ever in Russia to begin with? Did he ever leave the U.S?

I think the best way to challenge the 'debunkers' is to simply ask them basic questions about the facts they believe they know and to ask them to be able to independently verify.

Expose the argument from authority they are using or relying on and see how they react. While, ultimately, you can't require every single piece of evidence to be video recorded or something of the like - it is the standard against which every claim and it's evidence base should be evaluated.

The goal isn't to convince everyone today. The goal is to convince more people to begin questioning and looking behind the curtains, under the cushions, etc - to become their own investigators and report to their friends and cohorts what they find… Such that it eventually finds its way into the collaborative Intel effort.

Some secretary, who has been quiet for decades, puts some pictures or documents on blast (preferably legally) and blows the whole works up.

Which is why an IBOR could be extremely important. As of now, if I just put files on blast from work or something, I am in a civil case for a long time. Whistleblower laws do not extend to social media as I understand.

That could be important - to recognize social media as a valid outlet for documents or other media incriminating of criminal wrongdoing, and a process for people to follow.

You know… I used to have a rather apathetic and passive stance on the issue of fake Q's and the other little trolls who like to come along. I like to believe in self-governance and that type of thing.

However, they have gone from merely disruptive to complicit in treason. The judgment should follow and they should be routed and forced to stand trial.

Then let to run from a swarm of predator drones. Because I want to see the live stream of each impact. I submit my vote as thus to Q. I am releasing authority to hunt at your discretion.

There is discussion, there is confusion. There is newfagging and plebing… And then you have enemy action. The actions of these trolls counts as enemy action. Aiding and abetting. Treason.

No hashtag. No petition. Let them stand tribunal and explain the logs of their behavior and why they should not be counted among the enemy.