Anonymous ID: 7cbfbb May 4, 2019, 5:27 a.m. No.6411008   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1015 >>1020

line of arguments currently floating across twitter:

"even if spying, etc. started in 2015, all was justified because there were plenty of indications that Trump is corrupt."

 

what happens to those arguments if/when it is 'discovered' that he wasn't the only candidate spied upon?

Anonymous ID: 7cbfbb May 4, 2019, 5:48 a.m. No.6411063   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6411015

True, but their target audience is independents and those in the D base who are beginning to question the narrative regardless of their personal views of DJT. Triggering emotional reactions vs. logical thinking.

>>6411020

Indeed.

Anonymous ID: 7cbfbb May 4, 2019, 6:02 a.m. No.6411131   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6411056

Great part about this is that it forces the matter into the judicial branch where it belongs instead of allowing Congress the opportunity to write more bad legislation.