>>6412500

> But I can say that telephony has gone to shit in the last 20 years.

sadkek.

just like the mandatory death of analog tv to quickly impose all-digital full-surveillance model…

clear case of Wonderful Brand New World Tech replacing perfectly fine working technology and being actually much shittier.

Them good ole land lines, you could spend hours on the phone, no problem. Maybe a little red on the ear for having the phone on it for so long.

But sound-wise it was clear and sounded great.

But cell-service, even when at its best, is always a bit robotic and grating. Can hardly stand more than a few minutes of it…

shame

>>6412415

eons ago, research on that made the top ten of Project Censored on news being ignored.

Lab rats/mice with cancer, some had full recovery from tumors.

Insanely, exponentially more positive results compared to anything the news whips out once in a while about a "promising new lead in cancer research" but that never produces anything remotely close to that.

>>6412680

that, and worse.

but hey, he FAMOUS

>>6412642

>>6412570

damned Globals slippery slope.

it's almost a daily fight to keep it clean and safe from the constant popularity contest/anons' feelz that their notable is global-worthy.

ebbs and flows and mostly under control, but sheit if that wasn't predictable and predicted.

>>6412755

<Q post without trip are NOT to be entered into Notables

wrong

-Q posts without trip are NOT to be entered into Q posts list

-it's not confirmed it is a Q post anyway

-as a post of interest, Q or not, no reason not to have it in regular notables

>>6412767

>no clue what you mean by "popularity contest"

anons lobbying for putting their posts in Globals rather than regular notables for reasons

> so newfags and anons could see there is a new notables archive

sure, you/we'd want that, but there is no particular urgency and massive importance to that.

better for it to have a spot in the dough that is not erased a couple breads later anyway.

you can argue a valid case for having this one Globalled, sure, i'm just pointing out how having this Super Elite Tier of notables always, always, always devolves into useless anons lobbying for their own.

>>6412786

>Q specifically said not to

yes, when anons/BO/BVs can see it's an actual Q post.

in this case we don't, it's just a post of interest from an un-determined source.

it of course shouldn't be listed as a Q post, but there's always room in notables for all sortsa posts

>>6412889

SJWs as the contemporary Temperance Leagues of old

>>6412945

>>6412822

more like an abusive husband lamenting his wife just not being into it as much anymore…

Juncker & Verhofstadt are open Imperalists who want to fight China for African resources